There are several positions regarding the Second Vatican Council and its relation the current crisis in the Church. One position states that the council is the cause of the crisis which saw the destruction of the practicing Catholic and decline in vocations.
Another argument is that the Second Vatican Council is perfectly fine. It has some flaws like any other council, but the controversies are overblown and reactionary. The council’s documents are easy to understand and do not introduce any novel thinking or ambiguity. Instead, the real problem was caused by bad men who hijacked the council, and it simply needs to be implemented correctly.
Still others will try convincing one’s audience that it takes 100 years to implement a council. Then there is the argument that the culture was getting so bad that it eventually became the root cause of the entire crisis in the Church. The external forces of the cultural decay slammed the Church so hard, like a castle being besieged, it eventually caused many of her members to fall away or be corrupted.
This post is not going to analyze these arguments in any detail. Rather, we will provide documentation from those who worked at the council itself, or who were associated with it in some way. We will also throw in a few more theological opinions on the nature of the council from other scholarly sources.
These sources will explicitly indicate that the texts of the Second Vatican Council are problematic. The texts are sometimes full of ambiguity, imprecision, silence, or badly worded explanations. All of this produces an excess number of differing interpretations, which is one of the main ingredients for confusion.